Cricket, Politics, and Controversy ............



Wednesday, November 30, 2005

India’s ‘intellectual capital’, is it really intellectual??

I recently read a blog that spoke about “India’s IT industry that uses over-skilled workers”. Here’s a link to it: http://thekingofdreamers.blogspot.com/

1) This is my take on India’s IT/BPO industry. There’s no question about the fact that the Indian economy is booming right now. The IT Services and the BPO industry contributes quite heftily to India’s GDP, irrespective of whether it is products based or services based. So no point complaining about it.

2) The over-skilled workers/engineers that ‘dreamer’ is talking about, I think is a pure over-statement. I agree with the fact that engineers at various companies like Sathyam, Wipro and various other companies get to do work that is pretty easy to do, that doesn’t kindle the brains of the ‘smart’ engineers India produces. But, what else can they do. It’s not true that, these ‘engineers’ work in IT Services companies because these are the only jobs available. Some of the world’s biggest product-based companies including Intel, Texas Instruments, Motorola and AMD, are looking to hire a lot of people into their Indian design centers, but find it extremely difficult to do so. There are just not enough people who are good enough.

It is probably true that, these engineers at software companies across the country are quite over-skilled for the work they do. But they don’t have enough skills to work in the ‘next-level’ of roles. The basic problem that India has, is not about the IT/BPO industry, but engineering education in India. Apart from the 7 or 8 IIT’s, and few good engineering colleges here and there, most of the other engineering colleges provide quite low level of skill sets which are quite useless, and cannot be used anywhere else but in the IT services sector. This has to change. Engineering education should become more ‘current’, ‘useful’, ‘challenging’ and not something that anyone and everyone can get without too much effort.

3) India’s true ‘intellectual capital’ lies in our ‘managerial talent’. These IT/BPO companies that are doing well employ some of the ‘smartest’ managers you can find. These guys are responsible for bringing in business from the US/ Europe and various other parts of the world .There’s no question about the fact that India’s managerial talent is quite solid and these guys need to be given credit to what they have done to the Indian economy.


So, here’s my point. 80% of the ‘engineers’ doing work that is “too easy” for them, are just not good enough (at least with their current skill sets) to do anything better. Engineering education in India should become “more challenging”, “more practical” and “more sensible”. Till then we’ll have to rely on our “managers” who’ll have to keep bringing in more money into the country. Of course, the other solution to this problem is that the “real smart engineers from the IITs and some other good engineering colleges” who tend to work abroad, have to comeback to serve their own country.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, November 02, 2005

Who is India’s smartest person?

3 blog postings, all 3 saying Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar is not the best, now its time to talk about people I think are smart, intelligent and among the most enterprising.

I have been publishing like crazy, people who read this (is there anyone?) might start thinking I am jobless. If you thought so, you are totally wrong. I write more when I have more work, because I take more breaks in between working, and when I take a break, I blog. You get it?

Anyway, getting back to our question, who is India’s smartest person?

The Nominees are (in no particular order)
1) Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar
2) Dhirubhai H. Ambani
3) Jamshedji Tata
4) Mahatma Gandhi
5) Azim Premji

According to me, being smart is all about being rich and famous, and maybe a few other minor things. 4 of the 5 people above are definitely rich, and famous, and they have made a difference to the lives of hazaar people. Mahatma Gandhi is the "FOT" nation, so he's in.

But who has made the biggest difference. I think its Jamshedji Tata. 91 operating companies across some 10 sectors, employing about 220K people, and supporting another 200K, a shareholder base of 2 million people and contributing to about 3 % of the country’s GDP. And all this, has played a key role in building a nation-India.

Sachin falls out of contention because he hasn’t contributed to the wealth of the country. Mahatma Gandhi is a tough call. But you can never tell for sure what would have happened if he wasn’t there during independence. There’s too much unproven information about the Mahatma, and It’ll be an interesting thing to find out, what would have happened if there was no Mahatma Gandhi during independence. Azim Premji is India’s richest right now, he’s famous, he employs close to 300K people, maybe more, but he didn’t build his wealth from scratch. Ambani and Jamshedji did. It’s not Premji’s mistake though.

Dhirubhai Ambani is my No.2, typical rags to riches story, and he can boast of the same contribution to India’s wealth and GDP, but Jamshedji won because he has contributed more to the fundamental growth of a nation.

Labels: